The Winnipeg Free Press reviews The Follies of Richard Wadsworth

“Drawing on the absurd” / Winnipeg Free Press / Nyala Ali / July 13, 2019

The title of Nick Maandag’s new book, The Follies of Richard Wadsworth, is actually a misnomer.

The story Wadsworth is a campus satire loaded with odious rivals, dying disciplines, bureaucracy and precarious labour (the titular Wadsworth is an adjunct philosophy instructor whose last university appointment ended badly, for reasons which become quickly apparent).

But the follies also extend to two other stories, Night School, about a fire prevention chief who ends up in charge of a business admin class, and The Disciple, in which a young, celibate monk grapples with lust at a coed monastery.

All three tales in this collection essentially chronicle folks who refuse to adhere to their given role in already-established systems, and instead hold their own rigid ideas about how things should work as Maandag takes us for an awkward, disorienting ride.

Always, absurdity ensues — after overhearing some gossip about the fate of the Classics department, the titular Wadsworth literally climbs a wall to escape being seen. The expertly paced Night School is perfectly Kafkaesque, as questions from all involved are met with increasingly ridiculous punishments (one of which also involves a wall). The Disciple’s abominable sight of monks include Brother Bananas, a monkey who is evidently not the only one succumbing to his basest instincts. Throughout the book, the intentional monotony of meticulously cross-hatched panels complements the storylines well. Many characters also share some of the same facial features, which the author exploits to its full potential.

Sometimes hilarity also ensues, as Maandag fully embraces the discordance of a lighthearted tone while depicting some truly awful situations. The kind of deadpan cringe-humour Maandag deploys in these stories is particularly reminiscent of Tim Robinson’s hit Netflix sketch comedy series I Think You Should Leave, also rife with horrible people and elaborate punchlines that result from characters doubling down on their terrible choices and actions. The difference, though, is that while Robinson’s characters are more or less equal in status, Maandag instead uses characters from different walks of life to point out the corruption in power structures.

While this sometimes works to a delightful effect — in Wadsworth, for example, the titular instructor confuses a caretaker with the dean, mentally imbuing the former with the authority of the latter — Mandaag also writes numerous gags in which those who don’t benefit from the power imbalance are the target of the jokes. Notably, female students are preyed upon quite explicitly by authority figures in Wadsworth and The Disciple, and the teacher in Night School doesn’t fare much better after relinquishing control of her class to the deranged fire chief who just happened to be investigating a faulty alarm.

Maandag is obviously an equal-opportunity satirist, but opportunities (and subject positions) are, unfortunately, not equal, something that often goes unaccounted for when interpersonal boundaries are pushed to absurd limits for a gag and the perpetrator’s actions still go mostly unacknowledged, let alone unpunished.

Although The Follies of Richard Wadsworth is clearly interested in dismantling power dynamics within established structures (and pointing out hypocrisy in systems that only benefit certain people), setting up the less privileged to take the fall for a lark doesn’t quite work. Though the book’s central characters are visibly incompetent, they still wield (and abuse) power to an uncomfortable, ruthlessly accurate degree. But we already know that this regularly happens, and some good schadenfreude when these men occasionally get their comeuppance isn’t necessarily enough to combat the malaise of realizing how pervasive Maandag’s breed of unchanging, self-absorbed rule-breakers are.


Share on Facebook
Share on Tumblr
Share via Email